TerrorBite :verified: boosted

I just noticed "foreach" on npm is controlled by a single maintainer.

I also noticed they let their personal email domain expire, so I bought it before someone else did.

I now control "foreach" on NPM, and the 36826 projects that depend on it.

Show thread
TerrorBite :verified: boosted

Trans people don't just exist. They are beside you in time and space, and they matter. Great artists, engineers, scientists, and leaders... they occupy a place in every strata of our cultures.

Hackers.town not only sees you... hackers.town applauds you, raises you up, and demands others do too.

No laws can erase these people. These attempts are not only futile, but also the death throes of angry, small-minded people.

Be mighty my friends, challenge your preconceptions, and join me in standing against injustice and raising these souls up and into the light... not just today... but every day.

TerrorBite :verified: boosted

My phone now runs xscreensaver when I put it on the charger and this makes me very happy

Idea: stop using the word cryptocurrency. Instead: “Cryptostocks such as Bitcoin and Dogecoin…”

See how long it takes before people get really upset. “He's right, but he shouldn't say it!”

TerrorBite :verified: boosted

@TerrorBite Also, the people who do the work of reviewing papers and deciding whether or not they should get that stamp of certification? Academics. Who don't get paid for doing it. Nobody cuts me a check specifically for reviewing a paper (though I have gotten free books for reviewing proposals for textbook publishers).

You *could* argue that reviewing papers is just part of the general community-support work that an academic on a salary is expected to do with some fraction of their time. Or that I have some obligation to use my expertise to help keep the field as a whole healthy. OK. But *somebody else* is making *actual money* off that work I do.

Or rather, *did* --- I've scaled way back on the journals that I'm willing to referee for.

An argument that's often made is that piracy harms content creators. That music piracy impacts the revenue that artists earn through royalties, etc. The gist of the argument is "piracy hurts those who make the content you love".

Whether you believe that or not, do you know who this DOESN'T apply to?

Do you know who receive NO royalties for their published work, and in fact must PAY just to get published? Academics.

You should feel no guilt for obtaining free scientific papers. The authors are losing nothing; their research is being seen by more people than it would otherwise.

So why do they pay to get published? Reputable academic journals serve as a clearing-house. Getting your paper published in a journal is a mark of quality, indicating that your paper has been peer-reviewed and accepted as a valid contribution to science and knowledge. And I have no problem with this; people pay for certifications all the time.

What I have a problem with is that the journal, who have already been paid to publish the article, then turn around and charge the general public for access to the article. (I guess it's usually free if you're a student, but still.) Essentially the journal is taking ownership of, and restricting the dissemination of the scientific knowledge that they were paid to publish.

Publish: from the Latin publicare, "to make public". If it's behind a paywall, it's not publically available; so technically, it's not actually published.

Consider also the rise of "predatory journals", something that can only exist because of this business model. Predatory journals basically exist to scam academics into "publishing" their work in a journal that is neither peer-reviewed nor reputable. They also make money off those who want to advance an agenda; predatory journals will happily take money to publish just about any paper, including those which were outright lies or would never pass a real peer review.

The only ones who benefit financially from all of this is the journals themselves.

So, pirating academic papers may harm the journal it's published in, as they lose out on potential access fees. But the authors don't lose anything financially. And they also don't lose any value in publishing; they are paying for the legitimacy that being reviewed and published grants their work, and the journal still receives the publishing fee. And the journals will always get plenty of money flowing in from all of the universities that provide access to their students.

Who's really losing out here? Anyway, SciHub is a thing.

TerrorBite :verified: boosted

If your username was a function in a programming library, what would it do?

TerrorBite :verified: boosted

If ASN.1 was so good why isn't there an ASN.2?

TerrorBite :verified: boosted
so you're bored, huh? why not finish an old project you've been putting off forever
TerrorBite :verified: boosted

i just bought this energy drink from the convenience store today because it looks a bit off.

TerrorBite :verified: boosted
TerrorBite :verified: boosted
TerrorBite :verified: boosted

NFTs is just people claiming they own other people's artwork somehow

TerrorBite :verified: boosted
TerrorBite :verified: boosted

The reason programmers are such stressed people is because the computers are winning

TerrorBite :verified: boosted


any insufficiently moderated public forum will automatically turn into 4chan in less than 2 weeks. anyone who doesn't assimilate to the edgyness that starts with one or two people will either leave or go silent.

please moderate your public (online) spaces.

Show older

A bunch of technomancers in the fediverse. This arcology is for all who wash up upon it's digital shore.