@sh No. I don't. Monetarily and strategically, it's way cheaper to pay a single point of failure to implement a critical service on your behalf because it pushes the culpability off of you and onto the provider. Folks really underestimate the value of being able to blame someone else for your problems.
This is _very_ powerful. Yet I wonder how companies could be convinced to do more on their own again. Maybe when the big nodes are getting attacked heavily so outages and data breaches are cutting into companies revenue more than the savings?
I know this is wishful thinking. It won't change in my lifetime. The big ones won.
A bunch of technomancers in the fediverse. Keep it fairly clean please. This arcology is for all who wash up upon it's digital shore.