Pro tip:

Memes that immediately polarize any two target groups are likely manufactured to manipulate social attitudes and stop the opposed groups from finding commonalities, and breaking down avenues of communication.

You should consider seeking values that bind us, not issues that divide us.

@alexbuzzbee In b4 the "ache fews" crowd:

Yes, the Internet Research Agency is absolutely guilty of this, and high awareness of epistemic techniques goes back to Lenin ("First sieze the telegraphs").

They're not the only ones, however. The US's COINTELPRO archives are online ( and show tactics used _within the US_ in the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. That's supposedly Not Done Anymore, though there are clearly actions abroad (Shrub and WMD, others).


@thegibson Like: how evil the rent economy is. Or how copyright should protect artists, not disney.

@TheGibson Yes! Or as I like to call them: bumper stickers from hell.

But maybe I shouldn't put it that way. It seems divisive?

@thegibson I submit that strong, partisan statements, while useless for convincing anyone to change their mind, are still good for rallying the faithful. But yes, your broader point is well taken.

@mkb I suppose that in your provided context, @TheGibson was trying to suggest that you ask what the 'faithful' are rallied towards by partisan memes.
And, whether rallying the faithful is even worth it, if they are rallied to 'war' against the 'other' who shouldn't really be their enemy at all.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

A bunch of technomancers in the fediverse. Keep it fairly clean please. This arcology is for all who wash up upon it's digital shore.