@thegibson kill it with fire.
I mean it's surely IOT shit... on the other hand, gives us a testbed for countermeasures.
It's not a timeline, it's a timenargle.
@thegibson The actual William bloody Gibson wrote, in Pattern Recognition, of Case's nigh-allergy to advertisement, and I have rarely had anything resonate quite so vigorously.
Paper adverts are bad enough, but moving pictures may be enough to have me doing my shopping entirely online.
Though I note that polarized sunglasses can render some screens utterly black. Knowing the specific peril, and with partial occlusion, suddenly Joe Janta seems a sane solution to danger.
The dystopia is already here – and it’s globally distributed...
The good thing is there’s not an overwhelming amount of taxis with these... yet. I’ve only seen a handful of them and I take a taxi two to three times a week. I always pass on the ad ones and I suggest everyone else do the same. It’s not like there’s a shortage of taxis.
@thegibson I know right? It's unbelievable how good of service we'll get, with adverts custom tailored to us.
@TheGibson Yet another reason to always carry a sharpie with you.
I truly don't understand why tailored adverts/coupons aren't illegal. Especially based on age/gender/race/whatever. As this soaked in beyond tldr level I... will endeavor to shop at smaller corner stores, or shops explicitly dissociating themselves from this nonsense. Everything else going on with cameras is bad enough. Wtf.
(Just rage-reinstalled an OSM editor because I saw a newly installed camera downtown that encompasses a broad section of public walk and hasn't been marked yet.)
But folks are missing your point. Or we're all too angry to plot effectively. When they fully enable this, it's a dangling litmus paper. It's an active node of _their software_ responding in realtime to _our inputs_, which lets us learn and exploit its behavior. Most cameras take and give nothing back. These (will) respond. Feedback is open sesame.
This is exactly right...
This quote from that article is either a _very_ bad example or a sad commentary on the _extremely_ low quality of advertising we got in exchange for the surveillance business model. Probably both.
Unless they want to sell razors to the clean shaven sunglasses wearer and sunglasses to the bearded person. 🙄
A bunch of technomancers in the fediverse. Keep it fairly clean please. This arcology is for all who wash up upon it's digital shore.