Put on the "to read" pile, but I get I don't think this is going to paint a good picture of industry funding science producing good results.

“A paper that actually shows a previous paper is true would never get published in an important journal,” he says, “and it would be almost impossible to get that work funded.”

Sign in to participate in the conversation

A bunch of technomancers in the fediverse. Keep it fairly clean please. This arcology is for all who wash up upon it's digital shore.