Put on the "to read" pile, but I get I don't think this is going to paint a good picture of industry funding science producing good results.
“A paper that actually shows a previous paper is true would never get published in an important journal,” he says, “and it would be almost impossible to get that work funded.”
A bunch of technomancers in the fediverse. Keep it fairly clean please. This arcology is for all who wash up upon it's digital shore.